Every country should have a free health service, even if this means that the latest medical treatments may not be available through the service because they are too expensive. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many countries, primarily the developed ones, provide free

services to its public. Due to the limited resources, it is pervasive that these services are fundamental and do not include any expensive and latest technological medical services. It is ultimately agreed that not all medical services can be provided in these services, especially the complicated and pricy

care services.

will be proven by analysing how difficult it is for the governments to support the essential free

services and how expensive medical treatments are not required frequently by the masses.

On the one hand, every government has a limited budget for the free

services provided in the

. As an example, annually, Canada spends about 11.6% of its GDP on

spending. Free

service is a high burden for any

, and many countries spend as little as 1.18% of its GBP on free

services,

not all countries can provide the high quality of medical services to its citizens.

, many medical technologies are not frequently used in hospitals.

is very apparent when new technologies are imported in the hospitals as doctors have been treating patients prior to the import of these technologies and may continue to use the same treatment methods for a long time. In most cases, new technology equipment would not be frequently used by the doctors as they rely more on their old methods.

After analysing

, it is clear that newly imported technologies would not be efficiently used in hospitals. Following the analysation of a government_s ability to fund the free

care services and how efficient the newly developed technologies can be used, it is clear that not every

can provide new technological services with free

service as these services might not be used by many of the citizens;

, it will put a

financial burden on the

_s budget.