It is argued that the parents of children who break the rules should be punished in some ways as parents are responsible for the children_s actions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Globally, juvenile delinquency continues to be a pervasive issue. There is an argument, whether the

should be responsible for their

_s actions or not.

are majorly responsible for their offspring_s actions, I entirely harbour the perspective that lawbreakers would be accountable for their offences and ought to be punished.

To commence with,

should be punished if their child does any crime as there are a huge number of cases are stemming from lack of parent_s attention and love towards their

. Nowadays,

are working day and night in order to earn a luxurious livelihood for their wards, but it affects terribly on their

as it will have detrimental impacts on their cognitive development, and they would be more likely to indulge in anti-social activities.

, I still hold the firm belief that

who commit crime should

receive deserving punishments.

, when the young offenders are punished with having custody and serve community service, they would deeply understand the seriousness of their wrongdoing and feel regretful. To be precise more, by conducting punishments, young people can be well-educated about the cost of crime committing and will never repeat the same mistake in future.

, if

will take all the blame on themselves, it will have misled impacts on their offsprings, which force them to understand that if they commit any wrong actions, it will not bother them.

, deserving punishments should be given to them to alleviate the causes of juvenile delinquency in the long run.

In conclusion, even though

are responsible for their

_s offences, the lawbreakers ought to be solely answerable for their crimes.

, I strongly believe that

should be punished according to the justice system.