It is often said that government spends too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

People often debate on the protection of extinct animals and

debate on the amount of money spent by the

to protect wildlife.

is a type of

that demonstrates how the people question the

even after doing well. The public is hardly concerned about the costs which are indulge in

projects.
The investment in

projects

huge. Even sometimes the expenditure exceeds the estimated cost. The budgeting is done by experts and experienced personnels and it will be extremely disrespectful to question their abilities and competencies.

, in a country like India people may be concerned about the

or malfunctioning of the

funds. I reckon the public should be provided with the essential information on

projects.
The other problems which are recognised to have more significance in comparison to the protection of wildlife could be education, health and pollution. These are some of the sectors where the

needs to give more emphasis. The increasing population is not mentioned because education will help the people understand the importance of population control. While the increment in

has to be achieved by the

and simultaneously the decrease in population will help in the decrease in pollution.
To recapitulate, I disagree with the statement above, that the

spends too much money in protecting wildlife. In my opinion, before questioning we must analyse that the cost incurred is right or there has been a malfunctioning in the balance sheet.