Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?

Some museums have an

while some do not. In my opinion, the drawbacks of an

are eclipsed by its benefits in the sense that the income will be ploughed back into

and development of the museums.

A major disadvantage of an

is the possibility of reducing the number of visitors. Museums house exhibitions and artefacts of great educational and historical value. If the chief aim of a museum is to introduce the local community,

should be free to the public and visitors. Take some folk museums in Hong Kong, which preserve historic relics and display folk customs,

.

to these folk museums, which are often monuments, is free of

. If they had charged an

, many might have turned to other activities.
Granted, an

might have a negative effect on the

figures, but an income is

to museums in terms of

. Museums feature educational exhibitions at times, and

could not have been done without a sum of money expended on hiring professionals and buying equipment. The Hong Kong Space Museum,

, has monthly exhibitions on different issues and professional docents are employed to take visitors on a guided tour around the museum.

example speaks volumes about how a reasonable

is advantageous to the

of a museum.

In conclusion, the disadvantages of an

are overshadowed by the benefits accruing from a stable source of income.

, having weighed up the pros and cons, I am convinced that museums should

an

for the sake of

and developmen