Many people judge success solely by money and material possessions. However, success can be achieved or measured in other way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

is judged by most people through wealth or material possessions while achieving achievement is possible via other ways. I fully agree with the above statement because the other alternative ways seem to be more beneficial for judging the achievement of a man than

and different material criteria.

To initiate the other ways for measuring the

of a

except for

and other material possessions. The

and foremost is the sacrifice of SOMEONE_S life for others. To explain, if a

sacrifices himself or herself not only for the welfare of the community but

country, it is

the biggest

in life, which is quite higher than

and may not easy to achieve for everyone .

, the revolutionary leaders

as Mahatma Gandhi , Subhash Chandra Bose, Chander Shekhar Azad, and Bhagat Singh , who sacrificed their lives for their nation, had no wealth or assets, whereby they are considered to be very successful without

and material possessions.

Another major way of judging the

of a

is

. To elaborate, when a

achieve the higher

degree from the reputed college or university while putting hard efforts, he or she is considered to be a successful

because getting an

is a big

in

present scenario.

, Dr Manmohan Singh , Who was the former prime minister of India , became the successful economist because of obtaining his doctorate in economics from oxford university in England.

In conclusion, I believe that a

can be judged by the sacrifice of life for others, as well as getting a good

rather than

and material possessions.