More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work, such as teaching and building houses for communities in poorer countries. What are the reasons for this? Who benefits more from this, the communities or these young people?

It is true that more youngsters in developed countries have allocated their time to do voluntary work in local

in developing countries. There are many reasons behind

tendency, and I would argue that both local

and people can benefit from

.

There are some reasons why the young spend some time doing

for local

in other countries.

, through philanthropic activities, they can gain more experience, and they can add them to their CVs.

, it helps them to job-hunt in their later careers and acquires recognition for their activities at their workplaces.

, some people prefer taking part in philanthropic activities, as they want to help those who are less fortunate without any reward.

, they want to share hardships and experience what it is like in remote places.

Both the young and local

benefit from

. In terms of the community, the young bring them their enthusiasm, knowledge, as well as

endeavour.

, they are strong enough to help disabled people to build new houses or renovate existing buildings.

, they can teach children literacy and numeracy skills. In terms of the young, by doing unpaid jobs, when they return to their home, they not only acquire more experience but

become more mature.

, they can live independently.

In conclusion, there are several reasons why the young spend their time doing unpaid jobs. Both individuals and local

can benefit from

, it is a win-win situation.