Organized tours to remote communities and other countries are increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for local people and the local environment?

Visitors love to visit rarely known places and are enthusiastic about knowing the culture of distinct tribes and

. I believe

is a positive development.

and foremost, tourists will encourage local people to preserve their culture.

, it is inevitable that

and old

are fading away and foreigners_ visits may work as a motivation for locals to hold their

tightly.

, natives may be proud of the

, which previously were a source of embarrassment, because when visitors show excitement about that country_s culture, natives may start to follow their

again, which once diminishes in the name of modern living.

, several communities have special dresses, which are becoming a thing of the past, but tourists might keep them alive.

tours to remote communities will do good but harm.

When people from different

travel through various

, they will spread rare and beautiful anecdotes and

around the world.

, tourism

provides financial aid and creates employment.

, many poor

that do not have many resources but beautiful places and rich

, depend on tourism economically. Meanwhile,

is indirectly beneficial for the environment

. As in order to preserve mesmerizing natural sites, governments try to minimise carbon footprint. Take Bhutan,

, which has a law that 60% of the land will be allocated for the forest,which makes

country carbon negative.

To conclude, I think trips to remote culturally rich areas bring several benefits and create an ambience of respecting each other_s

and rituals.