Scientific Research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is undeniable that scientific

is imperative for a country_s development in

modern world.

, it is equally important to have a control in place as to who can carry out

. To a larger extent, I agree that the

should have an upper hand when it comes to undertaking scientific

as they tend to be more people driven.

There are various reasons why it is pivotal to have

-run

projects.

with, when

is carried out by the

, the motive behind is always people-driven and not money oriented.

, there is more transparency in the process and the need to invest in a quality

that benefits the general public

increases.

, a

is borne to be more responsible and has complete accountability when it comes to investing public money in

.

, private organizations are not people oriented and they tend to invest in

projects that are more profitable.

, when the funding comes from the same organization, the results could

be biased to ensure there is a favourable outcome to the funding institution.

, companies that produce medicinal drugs are legally obliged to go through rigorous trials, which may take several years to complete. As private companies invest a lump sum of money in

studies, it is impractical for them to wait for a longer tenure to attain the expected results.

, there is a higher probability of the quality being compromised to make the

successfully.

In conclusion, carrying out and controlling scientific

is a contentious issue as transparency and openness are pivotal for a quality

. Undoubtedly,

is only possible if done by a non-profit organization like the

.