It is undeniable that scientific
is imperative for a country_s development in
, it is equally important to have a control in place as to who can carry out
. To a larger extent, I agree that the
should have an upper hand when it comes to undertaking scientific
as they tend to be more people driven.
There are various reasons why it is pivotal to have
is carried out by the
, the motive behind is always people-driven and not money oriented.
, there is more transparency in the process and the need to invest in a quality
that benefits the general public
is borne to be more responsible and has complete accountability when it comes to investing public money in
, private organizations are not people oriented and they tend to invest in
projects that are more profitable.
, when the funding comes from the same organization, the results could
be biased to ensure there is a favourable outcome to the funding institution.
, companies that produce medicinal drugs are legally obliged to go through rigorous trials, which may take several years to complete. As private companies invest a lump sum of money in
studies, it is impractical for them to wait for a longer tenure to attain the expected results.
, there is a higher probability of the quality being compromised to make the
In conclusion, carrying out and controlling scientific
is a contentious issue as transparency and openness are pivotal for a quality
is only possible if done by a non-profit organization like the
Leave a Reply