Some
believe that modern
is widening the gulf between rich and poor, whereas others feel that it is bridging it. I agree with the former point of view because
by and large benefits wealthy
.
On the one hand, it can be argued that the poor can now educate themselves online for free. In the pre-Internet era, those who had little education almost had no opportunity to ‘escape_ to better employment. They had to do low-skilled jobs and earn minimum wages all their working life.
, now poor
can acquire knowledge by reading articles and watching tutorials on the Internet without charge. The knowledge they have gained can help them change their fate.
, I disagree with
argument because those that are truly destitute might not have access to a computer or the Internet.
,
mainly works to the advantage of the rich.
is because they can afford to use advanced
to create more wealth. Manual workers, in comparison, are being replaced by automation.
, while Amazon founder Jeff Bezos is getting richer and richer as he keeps investing in logistics automation for the company_s warehouses, farmers and miners are losing their jobs to robots. I agree with
opinion because the poor cannot even keep their manual labour jobs, let alone close the gap with the rich.
In conclusion, I think modern
is exacerbating economic inequality because it is primarily in favour of already wealthy
.
Leave a Reply