Some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience and personal qualities when they look for an employee why is this case? Is it a positive or negative development?

It is true that in today_s Society employers tend to hire employees who are academically qualified than those who held more life experiences or simply good people. I opine that

change is a mixed blessing that has both benefits and disadvantages for some companies.

On the one hand, it seems that by hiring more employees with academic qualifications can boost a company_s development the way it wants. Since these workers have received proper education from schooling, they can contribute to the business by applying their knowledge that they have learnt from Qualified field of works. These staffs are more trustworthy in terms of the level of education they have received.

, by looking through the kind of degree that the person has, the company can easily determine if

the personnel that they want at their company.

, it is equally important to hire experienced workers who own some valuable information from their Pervious mistakes.

, if a firm is facing a severe crisis in its developing stage, an experienced employee would be useful since he or she might have the knowledge of how to solve

very issue.

, by having some experienced personnel in the industry, it would be more likely for the firm to tackle a major issue or avoid an unwanted situation.

In conclusion, if a business would like to develop

in a the way that any business wanted, it would be important for them to hire both academically qualified and experienced workers.