In many companies, when it is a time for decision-making procedures, only a few of the employers allow their employees to participate. It is very important that
working in the same
should be given that kind of opportunity because, from the organizational point of view, it will bolster their good decision-making and create an environment of coordination. So, my statement regarding employees participating along with their employer has more advantages than disadvantages.
with,
, people working in a company feel their workplace is like their
home when they are given the chance to raise their voice by participating in the meeting.
, employees do not consider their boss as master and themselves as
It seems that there is an article usage problem here.
servant in the
, if the work environment is made like that. The
would get motivated to work more in achieving the company_s goal.
, in Google, a group decision is made whenever there is a new meeting.
kind of process has created a friendly environment in Google and relations between every other crew member are tight intact.
, decisions made in combination have greater results in reaching the success of the
. To clarify, employers are not always perfect about the conclusion they make, so allowing different views of
members in the decision-making process would bring greater results in the
.
, in 2012, when Tesla was going bankrupt and Elon Musk was about to sell it. A final meeting was called out by its board members as well as senior workers which decided to continue running the Tesla
of selling to Apple. The result of that meeting has led it to be a highly valued company today.
In conclusion, the decision-making process is taking a huge responsibility. If both the boss and the
are involved in those procedures, it will not only benefit top executives but
It seems that preposition use may be incorrect here.
the entire
in reaching their target.
Leave a Reply