Some people believe arts such as painting and music cannot directly improve the quality of people_s lives so that government money should be spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

India is a diverse

and fine arts and music has been part of cultures from the ancient time. Few of masses believe that

creativity and talent could not enhance the standard of living of people.

, they think that

money should be given to several other areas. I totally

with

notion,

is not

perfect area to be focused there are quite

few other

as education and healthcare.

with, From

past couple of decades globalisation emerging rapidly,

, people need to all basic amenities to survive in

competitive world. To spending monetary finance on some cultural aspects

as arts and music would not be rational,

administration should provide assistant in

education and healthcare, which as most vital aspects for improving

standard of public as well as

.

, healthy and educated people could be given a proper contribution to the development of the

, which is far away for ill and unhealthy masses.

, It is

significant to preserve

traditional and cultural aspects which represent the

, that how it was in past and how development took place. Apart from

, Through maintaining historical things

as painting and traditional culture things,

country could earn

money through visitors around the

, as people always love to explore things that have some ancient story. To illustrate

, a painting od Picasso was visited by millions of tourist around

every corner of the world due to its story behind the sketch, Despite

, it was sold in about

of dollars, which make

economy to earning huge amount from

cultural things.

To conclude

, it is good to preserve old music and paint and spend

huge money to preserve them.

, I agree with that,

country should spend more on basic amenities

as education and healthcare facilities, as it directly contributes to the

and enhances the standard of life.