Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is important to find out how the increasing congestion on roads can be reduced. While some people believe that to mitigate

issue the authorities should invest in the construction of more and multiple lane

along with many others, opine that building

and

lines

a more effective way to reduce

.

On the one hand, some people support the construction of additional pathways and the widening of the existing ones because of multiple reasons.

, with the availability of alternative paths, the travellers can take the less congested ways and

reduce the

on the main roads.

, by increasing the

of lanes, the slow and fast-moving vehicles can have a different lane for their smooth movement. To exemplify, after the development of NH-8 six-lane Noida-Gurgaon Highway the daily ongoing

has been reduced to 30%.

,

solution is

as gradually it can increase the

of cars, bikes and buses on the roads.

On the flip side, some people assert that building

and

lanes are more beneficial for mitigating the problem of

and I fully agree with

view.

is because metro lanes, underground pathways and local

lines are the fastest and convenient services as they can not only cover

distances in a short span of time but

accommodate a larger

of passengers in comparison to cars and buses.

, if commuters avail of these services on a daily basis,

there will be a significant reduction of vehicles on the roads.

, with the introduction of

metro lines in New Delhi, 60% of road congestion was reduced in the

2 years.

In conclusion,

wider and multiple roads can reduce the

to some extent, in my opinion, to remedy

issue

and

lines are quintessential as these are fast and can carry a large

of passengers leading to less road congestion.