Biological diversity in the ecological system needs human preservation to prevent the extinction of
. It is argued that whether protection of wild animals should be all-rounded or limited to several wild animals. To me, human should conserve the nature without over-intervention.
It is said that Scientists and Zoologists should protect all varieties of natural animals. Every
are valuable to maintain the uncountable number of animal types.
, it will lead to over protection that the animals may lose their skills to hunt and to build a shelter.
, if mankind
tigers under protection, tigers may lose their innate ability to hunt prey and only wait for food provided by the zoo keepers. Meanwhile, when deers are protected, they may lose the awareness of danger,
they may be killed easily. Protecting all kinds of animals is another kind of destroy because the natural environment becomes artificial.
, some activists of animal rights emphasize only conserving the endangered
to prevent their extinction. The natural habitats of wild animals should not be disturbed. Only when the number of certain
dropped dramatically that going to be extinct, human must intervene to try to keep them alive.
, pandas were categorized as endangered
in China, and
the Chinese government devoted a lot efforts to try to
more baby pandas.
I agree that it is not necessary for
to protect all wild
. Human should only monitor and record different types of natural animals to have a better understanding of diversity in
. Unless the
encountered the danger of extinction, human should not intervene the ecology.
In conclusion, human activities
as cutting trees from the forest and emitting greenhouse gases that always destruct the natural environments. All people should bear the responsibility to maintain a lifestyle of less carbon footprint to provide a better living area for animals.
Leave a Reply