While it is widely claimed that some people think that nuclear artillery can create
in the world, others argue that it can result in relations crises. Both points of view and the reason why I believe that
artillery not be used as a diplomacy instrument to maintain international
will be elaborated on in
essay.
with, it might seem sensible for some to believe that nuclear
represent the peacebuilding strategy of a country, seeing that these
play a crucial role as a diplomacy tool in order to promote regional stability and prevent largescale conflicts that contribute to war. North Korea,
, has demonstrated a surprising military ability to defend itself against powerful nations,
as the United State and Japan, by conducting nuclear test sites. From
perspective, it is understandable why some would prefer the deployment of nuclear arms.
, opponents of
idea might propose that nuclear artillery can solely contribute to conflicts.
is because nuclear superpowers can deploy the existence of a military nuclear program to threaten their neighbours. Russia as one of the world_s nuclear power countries,
, has escalated its conflict crisis with Ukraine by emerging fears about the possibility of using tactical nuclear
. Personally, I would agree in favour of nuclear strategy threatening global
, since these
can be used in inappropriate actions
as military invasion. To illustrate, most of the powerful countries in the past forced smaller nations to immediately surrender amid nuclear anxiety.
, assuming that a superpower appears to create the fear that nuclear war could happen at any time, small countries might be lost their policy independence, leading to the potential exploitation of their natural resources and other benefits.
In conclusion,
it is undeniable that people support the notion of using nuclear
as a solution to world
, I am of the opinion by deploying these
only causes conflicts.
Leave a Reply