Disciplinary actions are important to maintaining law and order in a society. It is
thought by some people that the penalty for a certain
ought to be permanent, while others contend that the situations and the impetus for offending have to be considered when making a decision on the consequence of breaking the law. In my opinion, I completely agree that the conditions of an unlawful act need to be put into consideration before retribution for a just and fair verdict to take place and
to give room for human rights to be exercised.
On the one hand, some people think that the benefits of inflicting a fixed punishment on offenders far outweigh its downsides.
is because, it will make criminals think twice before they commit any wrong, as they are aware that punishment is strict and immediate without any chance to defend themselves. One very good illustration of
, is the declined rate of crimes in some countries
as Saudi Arabia that adopts harsh penal measures. Another reason is that, it will probably save a lot of time and money that could
be directed for use in much needed sectors
as health and education.
, some set of individuals believes that there are some forgivable circumstances around a particular
and I am totally in support.
, it is just reasonable to dissect all the conditions that surround a
prior to judgement.
is to ensure that an innocent person is not wrongly punished.
, a person that commits murder in the act of self-defence, the penalty to
should not amount to a life sentence.
, the implementation of a strict approach to persecute criminals without considering all aspects that lead to the
is a denial of the human rights law.
In conclusion, while opinions may vary, I strongly believe that events surrounding a
be examined before passing judgement to an alleged offender.
Leave a Reply