Some people hold that we should spend money and time on the protection of wild animals while others suggest that the money should be spent on populations living in the poorest areas of the world. What is your opinion

It is true that many people argue that people could waste

and time on protecting of animals. Meanwhile, some people believe that we should spend

on people who are poverty in the global. Personally, I agree with the

point.
On the one hand, people who believe that we should spend

on protecting of animals base their opinion on several reasons.

, protecting animals can help

regulation of

.

, animals eat each other to making recycling nature. If they are

, circulation nature would be broke.

, it can lead to climate change.

, animals can help to find kind of the medical in them.

, nowadays, experts use animals to test to find

to treatment

as test vaccines

.

, I believe that we should waste

on poverty people.

, spending

for poor people can make a their living

Government

to build new houses to people who are

.

, they can live a good condition and they can concentrate on working to

.

,

are labour and make country

in

.

, government can create

jobs for people by constructing companies

as

companies or clothing companies. As the results, with

,

can take part in market

in the world.
In conclusion,

both views certainly have some vadility, it seems to me

is better to spending monney to poverty people