It is asserted by some that they like to try different and new
as travelling to new places and tasting different new types of food. While others advocate to stay in their comfort zone and keep doing the
they are used to. Both sides of the argument present rational ideas which will be elaborated along with my own take on the matter.
On the one hand, there are a number of proponents who believe that trying new
proves to be beneficial. To put it differently, travelling and adventuring other countries is not only good for our knowledge but it is
necessary for recharging our batteries.
, trying different kinds of food from all over the world is a great adventure so I still get to know other cultures and
. Take a professional traveller as a salient example; One is more profound to have a better understanding of life and have a more active and energetic lifestyle.
, are bound to find more multicultural friends.
, others put forward the argument that a stay in a place they belong and doing the
they are familiar with is more beneficial. Simply put, not challenging ourselves and staying in our comfort zone is undoubtedly more convenient.
who prefer a sedentary lifestyle and try to avoid new activities or food are more likely to be susceptible to threats posed by psychological distress
as strain and anxiety. A good illustration of
is an old retired one who has a particular routine and if Something Happens out of his plan he definitely would get stressed.
To conclude, there are logical points on both sides;
, I am of the opinion that
need to be active and try to go out of their comfort zone in order to have more experiences and in
way they get to be mature enough to curb all their problems by themselves.
Leave a Reply