Some people think that business,academic and scientific information should be kept private. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

A group of people have views about keeping

privately with regard to the

,academic and scientific. While declaring scientific

publicly may have some drawbacks,I consider that sharing academic and scientific

is effective for the usage of the community.

It is believed by some that

,academic and scientific

should be unreachable for the citizens of countries.The supporters consider that announcing

can cause some catastrophic results in all 3 fields.The reasons behind that are the accessibility of

by terrorists in science,negative outcomes of publicizing

in the

world, as well as reachable academic data,

worsen the situation more than it has seen.While these could lead to negative consequences,I do not agree that we should

be deprived of all

in all these fields.

, I consider that academic and

,not scientific is more necessary to be shared with society in terms of being informed about changes throughout the world.Why academic

should be open to the public is because of making conditions easy for the researchers of learners , whether they are students or not.As regards

data, it is crucial for investors who want to access all

about companies for making comparisons before investing in those companies.

,scientific

may be accessed by terrorists easily ,if shared publicly,it does not give the right not to access some scientific

by the people of countries. A case in point is the exploration of climate change. By getting through

about drawbacks of it,they can be involved in prohibiting its negative results. Whereas,

like nuclear power,should be kept at closed doors.

In conclusion,I highly believe that all detailed

referring to academics and

should be open to the public,with the exception of scientific research where some should be applied some restrictions.