Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

One of the debatable concepts of today’s world is the

of wildlife

. A bunch of personnage claims that these

have to be completely shut down, howbeit there are some who express disagreement with it and buttress its continuation. In

essay, I will explicate both stances before presenting my agreement supporting the persistence of the

park with strict rules and regulations.

The advocates of closing down the

believe that the

are confining the

into cramped cages and depriving them of their natural habitat. The limited space in the cages makes the

arduous to move freely and

, these

are snatched from their natural mobility.

, the life span of these distressed

will be significantly reduced.

, all the

are innately social creatures. The environmental conditions of their natural habitats can never be replaced. For illustration, the noise level in the rainforest is approximately 27 decibels; whereas, in the

it can be around 60 to 70 decibels. Even the level of illumination of light is higher in the

than in a forest. From

, it is clear that there are feasible reasons to accept

side.

Reasoning from the other side, supporters of

extend plentiful reasons to show their prospectus. In the

place, the

are being used not just for breeding of the rear endangered animal’s species, but

these

are protected from poaching, climate change and pollution .

, in North America, the total population of California Condor was just 22 in numbers. Indeed, these condors were taken care of by the

and their numbers soared to 300 after the implementation of breeding programs in the

.

, animal species in the

park can inspire humans to study and explore them and

encourage them to donate for their

and survival.

, in the Zoology department, hundreds of journals are submitted every year exploring the ways of prospering the betterment for the care of the

. Altogether, these elucidations proofs the

of

are is discernible.

It is Apparent from the discussed points that both the views have their own clarification which creates arguments. I,

, am inclined with the

of

provided they must be governed by strict rules and regulations.