It is an irrefutable fact that art portrays the history of a nation beautifully. Many countries spend a considerable amount of funds on supporting the
, a segment of society is convinced that taxpayers money should be spent on more pressing issues
as education and medical care.
, both points of view need to be addressed before formulating an opinion.
The proponents of funding the
believe that it helps to nurture patriotism and harmony among the population.
, the nation_s sense of tightness can be enhanced. Take,
, China. It spends a large amount of money to restore the lost heritage before the Cultural Revolution.
funding, some artists cannot earn their living. Without
funding, these talented people would not be able to work and inspire others.
, art and
cannot affect the economy and improve living standards. There are more vital sectors that need funding. The
can fund healthcare, road infrastructure and education.
in turn can facilitate the development of a healthy nation, improve the economy and, substantially, living conditions. In my opinion, fulfilment of basic needs is more important than promoting national heritage and
, a sick and uneducated person cannot fully value a piece of art.
To conclude, despite the fact that
promote harmony in society, I personally believe that the
should not fund the
, money should be spent on more crucial sectors of the economy that can improve the quality of residents_ lives.
Leave a Reply