.Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

It is an irrefutable fact that art portrays the history of a nation beautifully. Many countries spend a considerable amount of funds on supporting the

and

.

, a segment of society is convinced that taxpayers money should be spent on more pressing issues

as education and medical care.

, both points of view need to be addressed before formulating an opinion.

The proponents of funding the

and

believe that it helps to nurture patriotism and harmony among the population.

, the nation_s sense of tightness can be enhanced. Take,

, China. It spends a large amount of money to restore the lost heritage before the Cultural Revolution.

, without

funding, some artists cannot earn their living. Without

funding, these talented people would not be able to work and inspire others.

, art and

cannot affect the economy and improve living standards. There are more vital sectors that need funding. The

can fund healthcare, road infrastructure and education.

in turn can facilitate the development of a healthy nation, improve the economy and, substantially, living conditions. In my opinion, fulfilment of basic needs is more important than promoting national heritage and

.

, a sick and uneducated person cannot fully value a piece of art.

To conclude, despite the fact that

and

promote harmony in society, I personally believe that the

should not fund the

.

, money should be spent on more crucial sectors of the economy that can improve the quality of residents_ lives.