Recently, there has been a ton of debates as to the traditional voting system. More specially, in regards to the passages, the
puts forth the idea that we have two alternative our previous manner of voting to the modern method. In the listening passage, the lecturer is quick to point out there are some serious flaws in the
_s claims. In fact, the professor believes utilizing computer when they vote might be an issue either and addresses in detail the trouble with each point made in the reading text.
and foremost, the author of the reading states that the poll can be imprecise. Some professional in the same field,
, stand in firm opposition to
claim. In the listening,
, the professor states that not all people are the same. Some people can afford buying a computer and others will not,
, not all of folks are familiar with computers there still many people from 17s are alive. Are we prevented them from voting and take their right?.
One group of scholars represented by the
thinks that people make mistakes when they do calculations. Of course, though, not all experts in
is accurate. Again, the speaker specifically addresses
point when he states that even machines can make mistakes because computers were created by humans.
means people can do something wrong in programming,
, it leads to failed process.
wraps his argument by positing that many complex processes utilize ballot, which means people cannot bear it and it will be hard for them. Not surprisingly, the lecture takes issue with
claim, contending that hard methods happened rarely. Approximately, it happens once every two years,
reason is not enough to use electronics rather than us.
To sum up, both the
and professor hold conflicting views about the voting system, It is clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on
Leave a Reply