The best way to solve world_s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree?

It is true that environmental

problems

are posing a serious threat to our planet at present. Some

people

suggest that the most optimal way to solve these issues is raising the cost of gasoline. In my opinion,

this

measure is ineffective, and there are much better ways to address environmental issues.

On the one hand, two main reasons why making

fuel

more expensive simply will not work. The

first

reason is that when the price of

fuel

increases significantly, it cannot have any effect on

fuel

consumption.

This

is because

people

still need to buy and drive their own vehicles, and factories still increase their production and release more and more pollutants into the atmosphere in daily life despite the fluctuation in the petrol price. Another apparent reason is that

fuel

consumption is one of the many activities that cause pollution. In fact, the cause of most serious environmental issues is the energy-hunger lifestyle.

For example

, the accelerated depletion of natural resources used to produce electricity and power machines can be attributed to the insatiable thirst for humankind_s energy.

This

, coupled with deforestation, factories_ discharge of effluents, the use of plastic, or the massive amount of domestic waste, can result in environmental pollution. Increasing the price of petrol is unlikely to have any impact on these factors, and

therefore

the view that higher costs of

fuel

cannot be considered the best way to solve global environmental

problems

.

However

, there are much better solutions to environmental

problems

.

Firstly

, the key to solving the world_s environmental

problems

is to find alternative sources of energy.

This

could be done by exploiting solar, wind, and tidal power, all of which are unlimited and clean sources of energy that are largely underdeveloped.

Secondly

, stricter punishments must be administered to individuals and companies that harm the environment.

For instance

, prison sentences may be given to

people

participating in illegal logging, and factories must be fined for releasing excessive toxic gases into the atmosphere.

Finally

, it is necessary for governments around the world to launch an international campaign about the dangers and serious repercussions of detrimental impacts that ordinary

people

have on the air quality or water resources. Once they are conscious of

this

negative impact, they would be galvanized into action and actively protect the environment.

In conclusion, I believe that the increase in

fuel

cost is futile in alleviating

problems

caused by the environment, and

therefore

, other measures to mitigate these

problems

should be considered.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*