The government_s investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

It is often argued that the government should finance public services

of spending its budget on arts,

and theatre.

I agree that the administration_s investments in public services play a very important role, I think that proper funding of the arts sector is

crucial for the

.

On the one hand, the government should definitely allocate a large part of its budget on public services.

economic sector determines the overall quality of life, ensuring that some basic services, like schools, hospitals and roads, are available to all citizens irrespective of their income or social status. Public services satisfy the primary needs of the

and

need a proper funding, while artists and musicians are not curing diseases or building houses, so their role is secondary.

, any country can live without

concerts, but absence of medicine will create significant problems. That_s why the government should adequately finance public services in the

place.

, arts,

and theatre are not a waste of money, since they are an integral part of the

_s cultural and intellectual development and amusement.

, art and

draw people_s attention to diverse phenomena and represent the inward significance of things. Quite often a single drawing, piece or song can exhort myriads of people to reconsider their attitude towards some situation.

way, art serves as a major source of nation_s personal and intellectual development.

, visiting museums, watching movies and listening to

are common ways of relaxation and entertainment.

, art sector is

important for the

and should not be neglected.

To conclude, though I agree that the ministry should allocate a large part of its budget on

urgent needs of the

like public services, I think that arts,

and theatre should

be financed since they play an important role in people_s development and entertainment.