The maintenance of public libraries is a waste of money because of computer technologies that have the same function. to what extent to you agree and disagree?

The technology of computers has provided numerous

so that investing money in

maintenance is considered wasteful. I completely disagree with the given notation,

the internet has given the easiest way to find hidden and difficult

with the easiest way still library importance can not be ignored.

and foremost technology is the easiest way to find any

and they can get any update from any corner of the world just by doing one click. Another reason for using a computer is because of a hectic schedule of jobs which make them tired and people avoid visiting

. In other ,words

are open just for specific hours of days which will restrict people to visit at a specific time while the internet is available at any time and all

is just one click away from the reader.

, managing

on a computer is just easier and reliable.

, the importance of

can not be ignored as the most reliable and authentic source of

is published books

for study it needs focus and concentration which can be available in

only.

, many old age people are incapable of using technology and

they find it quite difficult in accessing online

physical

are still their

choice to acquire

.

In conclusion, despite the obvious advantages of online sources of

, in my opinion, there are sufficient grounds to reject the view that maintaining physical

is unnecessary